for a pair of Lelli Kelly shoes?

I know they are pretty cute, and as a child Id prob have begged for them, but really £45-£55 a pair?! They are advertised relentlessly on nick jr (makes me think cbeebies with no adverts is the way forward as Caitlin becomes old enough to want things!).

Are they even good quality shoes? Or is it just the gimmick of 'free' make up sets/mini phones/extra straps etc you get with them?

Frigging god help me when I have Caitlin begging for them... or god for bid £100 nike air max when she is 14

yes. I want I want I want!!
Im actually waiting for hannah to grow into a size 6 as shes inbetween sizes just now and dont want to buy a 5 for her to grow out of in a few weeks.

its that advert it has me hypnotised

x

They are gorgeous, but not sure i would pay £50 for them. I have bought Immy shoes/boots of a similar price, but those Lelli Kelly things are just like pumps.

No way. I'm not a fan of lelli kellys and I hate buying things for the name. I don't think £50 for kids shoes is worth it at all. I think £26 for clarks is a rip off.

Im not the biggest fan of them.

Seriously, £50 for a pair of pumps? Somebody has to be pulling the pisser on that one!

IF (BIG IF, as I change the channel with the annoying advert comes on), Aimee wants a pair, then yeah, im a sucker and would probably end up doing it, once and once only.

But she would sleep in the bloody things!

x

i wouldn't pay that much at this age, they grow too quickly. Ava is completely mesmorised by the advert though. x

I can catagorically say that Hannah will never own a pair of lelli kelly pumps - EVER!! they are hideous for a start and that's before i look at the extortionate price tag.

However lelli kelly do do other types of shoes and boots that are quite nice and they do look really good quality (our local soft play has a shoe shop attatched that sells them) so if money were no object then I may consider them - but money IS an object at the moment so no chance!!!

xx

no way would lily-ann have them...even if she didn't need special boots, i couldn't justify so much on a pair of shoes that she'd prob outgrow within 6months...i don't even think they're pretty!

No chance, they are awful especially the silver party shoes, they actually make me feel

I bought some little flowery pumps from Deichman for £4.99 the other day and Libby LOVES them, and at least if they get mucky or her feet actually grow its not silly money wasted.

I hate that advert!,

nope never !!!!!

Nope

Hate the ad and the shoes but then ive paid 45 for two pairs of skechers recently, one for now in 4.5 and a size 5 cos they had an offer on, so certainly at the mo that would be my limit

erm i would...... i love some of the lelli kelly shoes, not at ditas age but when she is a bit older then yes i will be getting her some....i didnt even know what they were until i went to a kids party n this little girl had them on n they just looked stunning! it's no different to raising a chav who wants the latest trainers at £60! =opx

Yeh I would... not the pumps, but some of the shoes are really cute! Only when she is older though!

Hmmm. Some of them are very cute BUT OMG at these

http://www.shoes.co.uk/kids/lelli-kelly/boots/straps_high_boot_lk9016-722600301/purple-patent/

Never mind the price, they're a bit erm tarty? imo for little girls.

yeh, and horrible! would never buy those for Izzy... 2.5 is about 10 years old is it?

No as I they don't do anything for me at all. However if I saw some I really liked then yes I probably would spend that much.

Well by secondary school at age 12 im sure I was a 5 (am a 6 now). Id say I could have been a 2.5 at 8.

When I first read 2.5 i was thinking toddler sizes lol. That would be AWFUL!

lol I bet you could find something similar for toddlers if you tried!

no no and no!

i can see paige wanting some when she gets to that age of want want. as she likes glitterly girly stuff like that as it is. i spent 16 quid on some trainers from next which are all pretty just for her to get them all mucky and dirty. so i dont see why i should spend that much one some thing which will get as mucky

Lisa Owen is in a size 1 at 6 yrs.. 2.5 would be around 71/2-9 yrs.. My 11 yr old is in a 6 now
IF I had a girl - NOPE I wouldn't buy them..
Are trainers that expensive for kids.. I've never paid more than £20 for Owen or Haydens.. Lewis is in adult size but age 11 so expect to pay more .

Emma'n'Hayden wrote:

Lisa Owen is in a size 1 at 6 yrs.. 2.5 would be around 71/2-9 yrs.. My 11 yr old is in a 6 now
IF I had a girl - NOPE I wouldn't buy them..
Are trainers that expensive for kids.. I've never paid more than £20 for Owen or Haydens.. Lewis is in adult size but age 11 so expect to pay more .

not if you go to sports soccer/ soccer sports which ever it is called!

One of Immy's little friends came round in a pair of the sandals yesterday, they are cute, but OMG they don't look worth £45! Although i suppose that is what grandparents are for!
Saw the ad for those silver party shoes though

nope!! we have a pair but only because we were given them!! NO WAY would I pay for them! especially as they woulndt last 2 minutes!!

But soon as the advert comes on lillie is transfixed to the telly dancing!! grrrrr